General Education Assessment: It is the policy of
Dakota State University to assess the general education
curriculum on an annual basis. The Assessment Coordinating
Committee has responsibility for general education assessment.
During 1994 and 1995, this committee developed specific goals,
outcomes, and criteria to assess the general education
curriculum. During 1998, the general education curriculum
underwent a statewide review that resulted in a set of seven,
system-wide general education goals. These goals ensure that all
graduates in the Board of Regents system complete an identifiable
and coherent undergraduate, general education component.
The system-wide general education component also ensures
students' ease of transfer between BOR institutions. Dakota
State University has incorporated the BOR-mandated general
education goals, criteria, and coursework into its general
education assessment process and has developed additional goals
concerning information literacy, personal wellness, and written
communication. These additional goals are also assessed as part
of the general education assessment plan. Based on the
system-wide general education goals, students will:
- Write effectively and responsibly and
understand and interpret the written expression of others.
- Communicate effectively and responsibly
through speaking and listening.
- Understand the structures and possibilities
of the human community through study of the social sciences.
- Understand and appreciate the human
experience through arts and humanities.
- Understand and apply fundamental
mathematical processes and reasoning.
- Understand the fundamental principles of the
natural sciences and apply scientific methods of inquiry to investigate the natural world.
- Understand and be sensitive to cultural
diversity so that they are prepared to live and work in an international and multicultural
environment.
Based on the goals set for Dakota State University's
institutional graduation requirements, students will:
- Find, evaluate, and use information
effectively in written communication in the social sciences.
- Understand the importance and holistic
nature of personal wellness and fitness.
Based on the goals set for Dakota State University's
information technology / literacy requirements, students
will:
- Be knowledgeable and competent users of
computer technology.
- Use technology appropriately to understand
processes and concepts in math and science, and to solve problems in those disciplines.
General Education Assessment - Procedures and Activities: Since 1989, DSU students
have completed the Collegiate Assessment of Academic Proficiency (CAAP)., composed of five standardized tests: Writing Skills,
Mathematics, Reading, Critical Thinking, and Science Reasoning.
Because DSU students need high-level computer skills, they also
complete an on-line computer assessment activity. The Computer
Skills Assessment Project (CSAP) is a locally developed, on-line
assessment tool, designed to measure students' competencies
in software applications and programming and their knowledge of
computer technology. The faculty in the College of Business and
Information Systems developed this assessment project in 1994,
have continuously reviewed student performance, and have updated
the exam. In addition to these exam-based assessment activities,
students report their satisfaction in nine areas related to the
general education goals. During 1999-2000, students participated
in the pilot test of a new computer competency exam (Tek.Xam)
being developed by the Virginia Foundation of Independent
Colleges. The Tek.Xam, developed to measure students'
skills in five areas, closely matches areas tested in DSU's
locally developed computing skills exam. During Fall 2000, the
Assessment Committee will again review the Tek.Xam to decide
whether the locally developed exam or the Tek.Xam best measures
DSU students' general education computing skills.
The South Dakota Board of Regents initiated a statewide
proficiency testing program in Spring 1996. Following a two-year
pilot phase, the BOR selected the CAAP as the proficiency exam
and set minimum performance levels in four areas: writing,
reading, science reasoning, and mathematics. (Because DSU was
already using the CAAP as part of the general education
assessment process, this BOR mandate required very little
adjustment in DSU's general education assessment plan. The
most significant change was dropping the critical thinking
exam.) The BOR-mandated, proficiency testing process is designed
to ensure quality in the system-wide general education
curriculum. Students and their advisors receive copies of the
students' individual test results. The institution also
receives data summarizing the performance of all DSU students in
a particular test group. The group results are used as one means
of assessing DSU's general education curriculum. Figure 1:
Collegiate Assessment of Academic Proficiency (CAAP) –
Comparison of DSU and National User Norms (below) compares DSU
students' CAAP scores to the national user norms for the
period of 1999-2000.
Figure 1: Collegiate Assessment of Academic Proficiencey (CAAP) Comparison
of DSU and National User Norms.

One primary area of interest in assessment is the link between
students' entry-level skills and the skills they acquire as
they progress through the general education curriculum. To
document this linkage, Enhanced ACT scores and CAAP scores are
compared in a value-added report prepared by the ACT research
department. The Assessment Office produces an annual report that
includes this data along with information on the other assessment
activities. This information is used to determine whether the
assessment criteria for each of the general education goals have
been met. The Assessment Coordinating Committee reviews this
data and prepares a summary report for the general faculty. The
summary highlights the areas of strength and concern and includes
a request for recommendations or comments. When the
recommendations include curricular changes, the committee
forwards them to the appropriate faculty groups and/or
committees.
Academic Changes Based on General Education Assessment
Data: The information systems / computer science faculty
revised the programming section of the CSAP after the first two
test administrations. Although students' scores improved
on the revised version, students' performance is still not
as high as expected in the segment of the on-line exam which
covers programming. The faculty and the Assessment Coordinating
Committee continue to review student performance relative to
faculty expectations and may revise general education goals and
outcomes associated with programming. Student achievement on the
CSAP also prompted the College of Business and Information
Systems to increase CSC 105 Introduction to Computers from two to
three credits, beginning in Fall 1999. Assessment data from the
employer survey and from the Tek.Xam prompted the faculty who
taught CSC 105 to incorporate topics related to
hardware and
networking into the course. After reviewing assessment data from
the last three years, the faculty from the College of Liberal
Arts recently revised the format of the English courses to
provide more intensive writing help for students. In addition,
the reading development course will incorporate more timed
readings to increase the students' success on the CAAP
reading test.

